Tag: candidacy review

  • Mass-Produced Copies and Hyper-Developed Skeletons of Our Once Quaint Towns and Cities

    I believe our cities and towns have lost a lot of their uniqueness, making it difficult to distinguish between one place and another. Every town has similar big box retailers, food chains, shopping malls, and the like, which eventually turn into vacant areas once suburban sprawl shifts into another direction. Originally every town had something that set them apart from the next town, but as modern times have developed, and with it the advancement of technology, globalization has kicked in full gear and our towns and cities have suffered, turning into mass-produced places.

    There have been efforts through the Main Street Program, and they have been successfully carried out, but not every aspect of a town fits within this program. There are many other aspects of planning that need to be considered. It is already apparent in comparisons from decades before to present day; towns almost shift into one another without much change or consciousness of the transition.

    As the Main Street Program focuses solely on the downtown area of a town, the surrounding business and residential community, which supported the downtown originally, is being overlooked as to its importance in the development of that downtown area. Areas that were considered nice residential communities and light commercial zones have been overlooked and essentially forgotten. The economic dynamic that once supported the town has changed; so even though the town is renovated, the economic support is not there to maintain that renovation and this is due in large part to ‘urban sprawl’ (where people have moved out of the downtown areas to be in newer and shinier suburban meccas). There have been a great deal of strip malls and larger stores built into those suburban areas which are now being abandoned because of tax incentives elsewhere and/or a change in the economy.

    As much emphasis as has been put on the historic rehabilitations of a few buildings, there should also be consideration for past and present rehabilitation and development. Most developers tend to plow under open areas, trees, older buildings, and anything that might be in their way of projected development. Through the years, this approach has been very prominent and has caused a complete change in the makeup and appearance of the original town.

    Examples of this phenomenon can be experienced along interstate corridors linking one metropolitan area to another. An example of this is witnessed in Florida, from West Palm Beach to Fort Lauderdale to Miami. Infrastructure has not historically kept up with the developing areas and consequently retrofitting roadways, traffic patterns, sewage, electric and water, have changed the appearance of ‘quaint’ communities into hyper-developed skeletons. Examples of these ‘skeletons’ can be seen in towns and cities across Florida, such as Tampa, Jacksonville, and Orlando, to name a few. The original flavor of the town has morphed into a conglomerate of mega-roads and multistoried complexes. Towns located along a coastline have often been altered to an unrecognizable state due to the allure of high taxes and high-density complexes. This has greatly changed sleepy tourist destinations into high-priced, glamorous and glitzy tourist marketed meccas devoid of their unique originality.

  • Conflicting Issues in Preservation: Solar Panels and Later Addition of Insulation Systems

    The first conflicting issue within historic preservation and/or restoration projects is the use of solar panels with historic structures is an issue that most preservationists tend to agree diminish the integrity of a historic building. As many building owners look for ways and means to reduce their ‘footprint’, solar panels are one of the most popular sources that ensure improvement of the building’s environmental profile. Considering most historic buildings lack environmentally appropriate resources, as they were built prior to energy efficiency assessments and LEED ratings, and most rehabilitation projects can cost a small fortune, it makes sense that a client would request the implementation of solar panels as a means of cutting their overall costs and ecological footprint.

    Great attention, care and thought needs to be taken when discussing the implementation of solar panels with a historic building, as many times these paneling systems can detract from the appearance and historic integrity of the building. Local historic guidelines should be consulted as well; as many times there are strict limitations enforced regarding what can and cannot be added to a historic building. These findings, along with the evaluated pros and cons, should be discussed in detail with the client.

    If the local historic board is restrictive against the addition of solar panels to a historic building, then either more research will need to be completed to discover alternative paneling options that may be more readily accepted or alternative placement ideas will need to be considered. [1] Luckily, there have been great advancements to the original prototype of panels first available on the market. Most models today are more historically accepted and less of an eyesore, including solar shingles that resemble slate shingles and are just as affective as panels but are more accepted by historic boards as well they are eligible for tax credits.[2]

    The second conflicting issue within historic preservation and/or restoration projects is that historic buildings were originally built without the addition of insulation systems, as building technologies at the time were not as advanced as they have become today. A majority of building owners want to counteract this problem, as it is not energy efficient and tend to unnecessarily raise electric bills. Again, this is a conflicting issues for many preservationists as later addition of insulating materials to historic buildings risk damage of architectural details or historic finishes. Another problem is limited space, as historic buildings may not allow for the necessary space in building cavities to allow for appropriate R-value (insulation).

    Polyurethane foam is used in certain cases, where historic buildings are not in jeopardy of losing their character or integrity through structural alterations of any kind.[3] Through careful analysis of the building and dialogue with professional insulators, it is possible that this type of foam could easily remedy insulation problems without building or structural modifications; the only drawback is that it is not removable. Another method, if the building’s original interiors have already been altered or removed, is to apply an insulating lining to the surface. This is surely not a possibility if the original interiors are intact and untouched. Research in Scotland has been carried out involving a system comprised of a thin gel mat, secured against the plaster wall with a steel mesh fastening system.[4] The positive thing in this case is that it is removable and non-damaging to the original wall. I would discuss possibilities with both the professionals and the clients to determine the best and most appropriate procedures to insulate the historic building.

    It is important that above all, the historic integrity and character of historic structures are not altered in any way through the realization of either of these issues. It is best to keep an open dialogue with a client, while referring to professionals for assistance and direction in these more complicated and detailed matters.

    [1] Benfield, Kaid. “Can Solar Panels and Historic Preservation Get Along?.” The Atlantic Cities. http://www.theatlanticcities.com/design/2012/06/can-­‐solar-­‐panels-­‐and-­‐historic-­‐preservation-­‐get-­‐along/2364/ (accessed April 20, 2014).
    [2] “Residential Installations.” Performance Solar. http://perfsolar.com/services/residential/ (accessed April 20, 2014).
    [3] “Historic Preservation Problems.” FOAM-­‐TECH: Problems=Solutions. http://www.foam-­‐tech.com/problems/preservation.htm (accessed April 20, 2014).
    [4] Curtis, Roger. “Energy Efficiency in Traditional Buildings: Initiatives by Historic Scotland.” APT Bulletin 43, no. 2/3 (2012): 16.